NATO'S MIND CONTROL INVENTION

There is no other option in the current geopolitical climate but to construct a new dominion based on hyperreality.

These days’s era-orientated, media manipulated civilization has succeeded in implementing a degree of hyperreality able to obscuring something remnants of truth nonetheless remain inside the common man or woman’s field of notion. This calls for a everlasting attempt to deviate interest from hyperreality itself. On rare events whilst hyperreality lets in a glimpse of its personal workings, it dangers turning into either self-devouring or appearing as self-parody.

NATO has been dealing with an existential crisis ever because the end of the bloodless struggle. To show its persevering with relevance, it has created a website referred to as Innovation Hub that is so extreme in its promoting of hyperreality, it awkwardly calls attention to the absurdity that NATO has come to be. The hub defines its intention because the protection of an enlightened established order that is permanently threatened by using evil forces hiding in the back of a sinister curtain. The Iron Curtain that defined the bloodless struggle has now yielded to a brand new virtual Curtain.

The hub wishes to simulate the meeting of first rate minds and become a “region where experts collaborate and design solutions assembly NATO demanding situations. by means of bringing collectively human beings with specific backgrounds or views, the Innovation Hub generates a better information of the problems, and fosters innovation.” It targets at no much less than a collective epiphany.

This lede stressing open collaboration introduces the initiative’s genuine purpose: “raise INNOVATION IN safety AND defense.” The internet site encourages anyone to enroll in within the optimistic dialogue to guard a brand new entity it doesn’t hassle to outline. It isn’t the territorial integrity of Western international locations or maybe the staying power of the neoliberal ideology that guides those countries. The modern language they use to describe it well-knownshows what it clearly is: hyperreality.

The Innovation Hub seeks to expand “the new third Operational dimension, besides the cyber and the physical ones.” What can that be? until very these days, warfare changed into basically the physical activity pitting armies against armies at the battlefield. That dimension nonetheless exists, even if the fashion is either to hide it from view by using relying on drones or chickening out troops from closing battlefields.

greater these days, the clamor produced by swords hanging armor, bullets, bombs and humming drones has been complemented with the aid of cyberwarfare — the “2nd Operational dimension.” probably more harmful than physical battle because it is able to be deployed anywhere and remains invisible in the course of and after its effective strike on a target, cyberwarfare appears regularly within the information.

From pressure of dependancy or clearly cognitive lapse, the media typically attributes diagnosed examples of cyberwarfare to Russia, although once in a while additionally to China. hardly ever does the media point out the real world champion of cyberwarfare — Israel. while Israel is noted, it's far never with the rationale to encourage worry.

The Innovation Hub seeks not most effective to prepare us for the approaching “1/3 Operational size,” however also to get us concerned in building it. NATO seems to peer this effort as a sort of social media dedicated to a truly hyperreal idea of protection and countrywide safety.

Scrolling down the page, we see our first hint of the center-piece of this new third measurement with this rationalization: “Cognitive battle embodies the idea of fight with out preventing. learning the cognitive domain constitutes a new important stake imperative to the era of combat strength …  Its very essence is to capture manipulate of locations, companies, gadgets, corporations, and countries, by way of focused on and affecting the brains in their employees, civilian as well as military.”

nowadays’s day by day devil’s Dictionary definition:

Cognitive struggle:

The idea put forward by folks who consider that with the help of present day era, and huge facts in particular, they can lessen different human beings and even whole populations to a country of brainless compliance much like their own

Contextual notice

Promoters of hyperreality locate themselves faced with the huge venture of defining an elaborate belief gadget designed to cancel and replace the general public’s present perception of fact. The concept of cognitive conflict is a great instance. It corresponds to not anything that has formerly existed in the real global. In all cultures, cognition and conflict have usually belonged to two adversarial spheres. One was the area of the clerical magnificence, the other of the warrior elegance.

The average person may naively think that the idea of cognitive war describes the form of intellectual battles which have usually taken place within academic disciplines consisting of philosophy, psychology, records and the sciences. Realism vs. idealism or the large bang vs. the strong kingdom idea might be examples of cognitive war.

thinking in those terms is the type of mistake people who persist on basing their reasoning on seen truth might make. The hyperrealists at the NATO crew offer the authentic definition of cognitive war: “In cognitive struggle, the human thoughts will become the battlefield. The goal is to exchange no longer simplest what people assume, however how they assume and act.” instead of beginning with the truth of human cognition and exploring how knowledge may additionally initiate battle, they select conflict (severe conflictual violence) as their place to begin. knowing is subordinated to the need for physical aggression.

traditionally, cognition refers to the human capacity to recognize truth. In its new hyperreal meaning, it signifies the acceptance of an alternative to fact. Cognition is the result of a person who can “capture manage” of different people’s wondering. We is probably tempted to think about it definitely as hyper-propaganda. however in preference to in search of to coax, convince and have an impact on, it seeks physical manipulate.

it would justifiably be known as the “super alternative” (of truth). sadly, that term has been co-opted by means of white supremacists to express their worry that mongrel races will quickly be overturning white Anglo-european civilization. There can also even be an unacknowledged hyperlink between the two.

The language of this new and advanced hyper-propaganda famous the scope of its ambition: “inside the army, understanding on anthropology, ethnography, history, psychology amongst different areas might be more than ever required to cooperate with the military.” these revolutionary, generously collaborative minds have chosen to “require” all of the human sciences to align with army approach. Isn’t that the bedrock principle of fascism?

The assessment they draw between first size battle — depending on bayonets, bazookas and nuclear bombs, built for an assault on human bodies — and the 0.33 dimension implies a shift towards a reliance on new technology that encompass no longer most effective mass surveillance however the lively control of human minds way to massive information, artificial intelligence and digital fact.

in their explanatory documentation, the proponents of the 0.33 dimension, as they sell “a important thinking on-line course,” cite this essential precedence: “Leverage technologies, inclusive of VR and AI to expand equipment in assist of better cognition and better choice making.” Sounds liberating, but this best will become possible due to the fact “the capability to govern the human thoughts using neurocognitive technological know-how techniques and gear is continuously and fast growing.”

Their message is easy: We should embrace a new technology of manipulation. “This enhances the greater traditional strategies of manipulation via facts era and records struggle, making the human an increasing number of focused within the cognitive battle.”

The NATO thinkers will object that their attention on this kind of aggressive hyperreality is protecting. They don't have any purpose to use it, handiest to fight adversaries who use it. however, as become the case inside the cold conflict arms race, there's a actual enthusiasm for being the only with the most unfavorable pressure and the willingness to apply it.

Historic observe

The North Atlantic Treaty agency turned into created in 1949, within the aftermath of global battle II, to comprise the Soviet Union’s ambition to unfold its have an effect on in eastern Europe — received thanks to the Potsdam agreement — throughout the relaxation of Europe. In 1955 the Soviet Union spoke back to NATO’s integration of West Germany via forming the Warsaw %. This concretized what British top Minister Winston Churchill had once metaphorically described because the “iron curtain.”

After the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, NATO’s raison d’être disappeared. in place of assuming that Europe, not divided into  ideological camps, could awareness on accomplishing non violent creation, the Western powers decided no longer simplest to hold NATO however to use it to stretch the tentacles of the Western economy into jap Europe. That kept alive the spark that led to today’s new cold warfare that also consists of Russia.

but with China tough Washington’s international hegemony, things get even extra complex, requiring NATO to react in the right way. In this sort of geopolitical environment, there's obviously no other desire than to establish a brand new hegemony constructed on hyperreality.